How can we help?

Polyosync provides execution history that allows users to review multiple recorded runs of a business process. This makes it possible to examine previous execution outcomes and identify differences between runs. How do I review multiple executions? 1. Navigate to Business Processes in your Polyosync dashboard. 2. Locate the relevant process. 3. Open its Run History. 4. Review the available execution records. 5. Open individual executions to examine their statuses, results, events, and errors. You can then compare the information from different runs. Does Polyosync provide a dedicated side-by-side comparison tool? The execution history interface supports reviewing individual runs. A dedicated side-by-side comparison interface should not be assumed unless it is available in your workspace. What should I compare? Useful comparison points include execution outcomes, generated results, recorded errors, and changes in the information processed. For example, a company may review several customer onboarding process runs to understand why one execution completed successfully while another encountered a configuration or data issue. Can comparing executions improve process quality? Yes. Repeatedly reviewing execution outcomes can help businesses identify recurring problems, missing requirements, and opportunities to improve process configuration. However, differences in results may also be caused by changes in input data or external conditions rather than by a defect in the process itself. Can I use execution history to measure efficiency? Execution records can provide useful operational evidence. Any efficiency calculation should use actual recorded measurements and an appropriate baseline rather than assuming that a successful automated run always produces a fixed time or cost saving. Polyosync helps businesses move toward more measurable AI-powered operations by making recorded process executions available for review.